![]() Dialogues of knowledge are frequently connected to places, such as artists’ discussions in cafés or salons, humanist discussions in academies, academic debates in universities, or oral transmission of knowledge between masters and apprentices of all kinds, from printers to metalworkers. Think, for instance, of artistic or scientific manuals or exchanges between correspondents of the Republic of Letters. But sometimes dialogues about knowledge did not obtain the desired results.Įarly modern sources frequently use the dialogue format as a vehicle to spread knowledge. Beyond the material needs for research, it should include a routine of shared meals and designated conversation hours. He described a place where intellectuals could observe and discuss natural phenomena. In 1659, John Evelyn wrote to his colleague Robert Boyle about his vision for the ideal institution for the exploration of natural knowledge. Leonardo da Vinci’s conversational efforts during his lifetime (1452–1519) were disregarded by other scientists because he essentially lacked the official credentials of formal education. During the early modern period, dialogue was employed to communicate and kindle knowledge. The Greeks and Romans used dialogue and banter as tools for philosophical explorations. ![]() Niccolò dell’Abate, Eros and Psyche, 1552-71, Detroit Institute of Artsĭialogue has always been the backbone of knowledge. ![]() Practices of Privacy: Vestiges of Dialogue and its Places Call for Papers ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |