![]() ![]() But a call that never went through, and that has no content, does not come close to being substantive evidence of an effort to influence a potential witness," said Patrick Cotter a former federal prosecutor who pursued organized crime figures, including mobster John Gotti. "Anyone getting a call from Trump, much less someone he never called before, would be uncomfortable. Such a staffer could fall into the category of personnel who maintain White House operations, not necessarily considered a member of the Trump administration. While the Wyoming lawmaker's hearing-ending revelation was dramatic enough, legal analysts and former prosecutors said the account lacked crucial details before it could be determined that Trump's alleged conduct was criminal.Īccording to Cheney, the call was placed soon after last month's hearing, featuring Hutchinson, a former top aide to Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows who told lawmakers among other things that the then-president was aware before the Capitol attack that some in the mob were armed.Ĭassidy Hutchinson, aide to former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, is sworn in before testifying before the House Jan. The Justice Department declined to comment, but the episode adds to mounting allegations placing Trump at the center of the most consequential events linked to the deadly insurrection – from promoting false assertions of election fraud and summoning the mob that subsequently stormed the Capitol to the more recent allegations suggesting Trump and his associates may have sought to intervene in the committee’s investigation. 6 witness contacts raise "concerns": Liz Cheney says it raises issues that Jan. ![]() ![]() 6 committee refers Donald Trump's witness call to Department of Justice for investigation “Let me say one more time, we will take any attempt to influence a witness’ testimony very seriously,” warned Cheney, who last month presented witness statements detailing contacts that raised "concerns." Liz Cheney, the committee's vice chair, said the alleged incident had been referred to the Justice Department as possible evidence of witness tampering. WASHINGTON – More than once during its year-long investigation, members of the House committee examining the Capitol attack suggested former President Donald Trump’s conduct was not only wrong but criminal.Īt the end of a three-hour hearing earlier this week, the panel made yet another startling disclosure, revealing Trump called an unnamed witness, later identified in reports as a White House support staffer, following blistering testimony in June from a former Trump administration aide, Cassidy Hutchinson. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |